RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The efficacy of a low fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is well established. After the elimination period, a reintroduction phase aims to identify triggers. We studied the impact of a blinded reintroduction using FODMAP powders to objectively identify triggers and evaluated the effect on symptoms, quality of life, and psychosocial comorbidities. METHODS: Responders to a 6-week low FODMAP diet, defined by a drop in IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) compared with baseline, entered a 9-week blinded randomized reintroduction phase with 6 FODMAP powders (fructans, fructose, galacto-oligosaccharides, lactose, mannitol, sorbitol) or control (glucose). A rise in IBS-SSS (≥50 points) defined a FODMAP trigger. Patients completed daily symptom diaries and questionnaires for quality of life and psychosocial comorbidities. RESULTS: In 117 recruited patients with IBS, IBS-SSS improved significantly after the elimination period compared with baseline (150 ± 116 vs 301 ± 97, P < .0001, 80% responders). Symptom recurrence was triggered in 85% of the FODMAP powders, by an average of 2.5 ± 2 FODMAPs/patient. The most prevalent triggers were fructans (56%) and mannitol (54%), followed by galacto-oligosaccharides, lactose, fructose, sorbitol, and glucose (respectively 35%, 28%, 27%, 23%, and 26%) with a significant increase in abdominal pain at day 1 for sorbitol/mannitol, day 2 for fructans/galacto-oligosaccharides, and day 3 for lactose. CONCLUSION: We confirmed the significant benefit of the low FODMAP diet in tertiary-care IBS. A blinded reintroduction revealed a personalized pattern of symptom recurrence, with fructans and mannitol as the most prevalent, and allows the most objective identification of individual FODMAP triggers. Ethical commission University hospital of Leuven reference number: s63629; Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT04373304.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the most frequent conditions in gastroenterological outpatient health care. Most recent research in FD has shifted its focus to duodenal pathophysiological mechanisms, although current treatments still focus mainly the stomach. AIM: The aim of the study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology of FD focusing on a paradigm shift from gastric towards duodenal mechanisms. METHODS: We conducted a literature search in PubMed for studies describing mechanisms that could possibly cause FD. RESULTS: The pathophysiology of FD remains incompletely understood. Recent studies show that duodenal factors such as acid, bile salt exposure and eosinophil and mast cell activation correlate with symptom pattern and burden and can be associated with gastric sensorimotor dysfunction. The evolving data identify the duodenum an interesting target for new therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, the current first-line treatment, that is proton pump inhibitors, reduces duodenal low-grade inflammation and FD symptoms. CONCLUSION: Future research for the treatment of FD should focus on the inhibition of duodenal mast cell activation, eosinophilia and loss of mucosal integrity.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Duodenales , Dispepsia , Eosinofilia , Humanos , Dispepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Dispepsia/diagnóstico , Duodeno , Eosinofilia/complicaciones , EosinófilosRESUMEN
Introduction: Functional Dyspepsia (FD), defined as chronic symptoms originating from the gastroduodenal region in absence of readily identifiable organic disease, is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders. FD is divided into two subgroups: Post-Prandial Distress Syndrome (PDS) or meal-related FD, characterized by postprandial fullness and early satiation, and Epigastric Pain Syndrome (EPS) or meal-unrelated FD, characterized by epigastric pain and burning.Areas covered: This review summarizes the existing and off-label therapeutic options for FD.Expert opinion: The identification of mechanisms, the Rome IV classification, the reduction of PDS/EPS overlap and pictograms for symptom identification allow a better diagnosis and a more targeted treatment choice. Acotiamide, a first-in-class prokinetic agent available only in Japan and India, is the only agent of proven efficacy for FD, but clinicians use acid-suppressive therapy, prokinetics, neuromodulators and herbal therapies for treating FD symptoms. New emerging targets are duodenal low-grade inflammation with eosinophils and duodenal or other modified luminal microbiota.
Asunto(s)
Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Dispepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Dolor Abdominal/fisiopatología , Humanos , Periodo Posprandial , SíndromeRESUMEN
The paclitaxel/carboplatin combination has demonstrated promising activity in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); therefore, we mounted an exploratory study of these agents with thoracic radiation (TRT) in locally advanced NSCLC. Eligibility stipulated a Karnofsky performance status >or= 70%, weight loss
RESUMEN
The paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ)/carboplatin combination has demonstrated promising activity in patients with incurable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our exploratory study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of this combination as induction therapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC, to determine the maximally tolerated doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin administered every 3 weeks during radical thoracic radiation after induction treatment, and to determine the efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming before induction treatment, followed by conventional G-CSF, compared with conventional G-CSF alone. Eligibility stipulated Karnofsky performance status > or =70%, < or =5% weight loss, and stages IIIB or bulky IIIA NSCLC. Induction treatment consisted of two cycles of paclitaxel 175 to 225 mg/m2 infused over 3 hours combined with carboplatin (target area under the concentration-time curve of 7.5) given on days 1 and 22. On days 2 through 15 and 23 through 36, all patients received G-CSF 5 microg/kg; half were randomized to receive priming G-CSF daily for 5 days before day 1 of treatment. On day 43, thoracic radiation (60 Gy in 30 2-Gy fractions daily, 5 days a week for 6 weeks) was initiated. At dose level 1, patients received carboplatin dosed to a target area under the concentration-time curve of 3.75 and paclitaxel 67.5 mg/m2 over 3 hours on days 43 and 64. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity, phase I escalation in three-patient cohorts proceeded to a maximum carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 5.0 and a paclitaxel dose of 175 mg/m2, delivered over 3 hours. To date, 35 patients (83% stage IIIB) have received induction treatment, 29 of whom are evaluable for response. Myelosuppression and neurotoxicity have been mild during induction treatment, prompting a paclitaxel dose increase to 225 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22 after the first seven patients were accrued. The phase III portion of the study evaluating G-CSF priming remains coded. Sixteen patients have received concurrent thoracic radiation and chemotherapy and are evaluable for response and toxicity. In sequential cohorts, the paclitaxel dose on days 43 and 64 has been escalated to 175 mg/m2 with only one episode each of grade 4 granulocytopenia and grade 3 anemia. In the first 13 patients evaluated, the severity of esophagitis corresponded to the length of the esophagus in the radiation treatment field: grade 1 in all six patients with esophageal exposure < or =16 cm and grade > or =2 in six of seven patients with > or =16 cm of the esophagus irradiated. Three episodes of grade > or =2 steroid-responsive pulmonary toxicity have occurred 2 to 6 months after the conclusion of concurrent thoracic radiation and chemotherapy. The major response rate is 38% to induction treatment and 59% to combined-modality treatment. Of the first 21 patients accrued, 62% survived 1 year. Induction paclitaxel/carboplatin therapy is active and well tolerated by patients with locally advanced NSCLC. The maximum tolerated doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin during concurrent thoracic radiation and the role of G-CSF priming are not yet established. Severity of esophagitis corresponds to the extent of esophagus irradiated during concurrent thoracic radiotherapy and chemotherapy.